When all candidates are measured by the same yardstick, the process feels more equitable. A common criterion doesn't guarantee neutrality, but it reduces subjectivity.
No assessment is 100% objective. The realistic goal is reducing subjectivity with the same rules and a comparable signal. Myth versus what you can expect.
Subjectivity never fully disappears, but it can be controlled. Equal rules, a common standard and comparable signal make selection decisions more consistent.
Halo effect, similarity, first impression: hiring biases are inevitable but controllable. Equal rules and a common standard reduce their weight.
Assess your applicants before the interview and compare them with common criteria. You decide; Kokoro gives you the support.