How to compare candidates with common criteria
When each recruiter looks at different things, decisions become inconsistent. How to compare candidates with the same criteria for more consistent, defensible decisions.
When each recruiter looks at different things, decisions become inconsistent. How to compare candidates with the same criteria for more consistent, defensible decisions.
When management asks “why this candidate and not that one”, evidence and the report give you the support to defend the decision with arguments, not intuition.
The interview works better when you arrive with evidence. How to use the assessment report to prepare targeted questions and make better use of your time with each candidate.
Comparing candidates auditably means assessing everyone against the same criteria, ranking them with a comparable signal, and recording why one outranks another so the comparison can be reviewed later.
A defensible hiring decision is one you can justify with comparable, traceable evidence: why one candidate over another, with criteria defined before assessing and a record of every step.
Quality of Hire measures how good a hire turned out once the person is on the job. It's approximated by combining signals like early performance, retention and role fit, connecting what was assessed before with what happened after.
When you assess your candidates with Kokoro, you receive a readable report that compares people with common criteria and helps you prepare the interview. This is what it includes.
The structured interview lets you compare candidates with a common criterion; the free-form one feels comfortable but leaves more room for subjectivity.
Shorten the interview without losing quality: arrive with prior evidence, define a few critical questions, and stop covering live what the report already shows.
Improvising, talking too much, deciding by impression, no common yardstick: common interview mistakes and how to fix them with prior evidence.
The interview concentrates subjectivity in impression. A common criterion and prior evidence help control it, even though human decisions still carry biases.
You read the report to prepare the interview: where to confirm and where to dig deeper for each candidate.
Knowing if your candidate screen works means checking it lets the right people through and discards those who don't fit, without cutting too much or too little.
Key recruiting metrics measure how long, how much, and how well your process selects. Which to track, what each says, and how to read them without false conclusions.
Turn the evaluation report into concrete questions: confirm strong signals and explore the doubts of each candidate.
A short definition of role fit: how closely a candidate matches what the position needs. Kokoro's selection glossary, with no performance guarantees.
A norm table is the reference table that converts a test's raw score into a relative position, comparing it against a reference group.
Reliability is the degree to which a test measures consistently: under similar conditions it gives a similar result, not driven by chance.
Psychometrics is the discipline that studies how to measure psychological characteristics —aptitudes, personality, competencies— in a standardized, comparable way.
An evaluation report is the document that translates a test's results into readable information to support the hiring decision.
Time-to-hire is the time between opening a search and the candidate accepting the offer. What it measures, where it stalls and how to shorten it without sacrificing quality.
Validity is the degree to which a test actually measures what it claims to measure and lets you draw useful conclusions for the decision it supports.
Competency-based questions that ask for real past behavior, not opinions, and how to anchor them in each candidate's prior evidence.
Subjectivity never fully disappears, but it can be controlled. Equal rules, a common standard and comparable signal make selection decisions more consistent.
Reducing time-to-hire without lowering quality means attacking process delays, not the controls that ensure a good decision. Concrete tactics.
Halo effect, similarity, first impression: hiring biases are inevitable but controllable. Equal rules and a common standard reduce their weight.
The offer acceptance rate is the share of candidates who accept your offer. What it reveals about your process, why it drops, and how to improve it.
Assess your applicants before the interview and compare them with common criteria. You decide; Kokoro gives you the support.